I initially stumbled across Feisol while hunting for a large, affordable and lightweight Carbon Fibre (CF) tripod.
There were plenty of CF tripod manufactures to choose from, namely Gitzo, Slik, Manfrotto, Velbon and Induro (aka Benro). However, Feisol was an unknown!
At the outset, I’ll be honest and state that I had coveted a Gitzo for years – don’t we all?
Many photographers use the 3 and 5 series and they have become pretty much the de-facto standard for wildlife and studio photography. Although there was one major problem, the retail prices of these Italian products from most UK distributors were blatantly obscene.
I know some will say, “you get what you pay for”, or “I wouldn’t put £10k worth of photographic equipment on anything else”, but surely there has to be an affordable alternative!.
First and foremost I’m wildlife photographer; I use Canon 1 Series dSLRs and large telephoto lenses. So bearing this in mind, I wanted something light, strong and well made.
Surfing the internet, I found a Taiwanese company called Fesiol who produce an array of photographic support products based on their own design and manufacturing techniques. I understand that they were initially a carbon fibre tube manufacturer, who recently diversified into the photographic support market. So I thought why not take the plunge and order one!
Fesiol’s flagship products include the “tournament class” second generation CT-3XX2 series. These are available in 3 and 4 section variants and their pricing is extremely competitive e.g. CT-3374 is priced ~40% lower than the Gitzo 3540VLS (based on current UK distribution pricing).
Feisols goals is “We want to show the world that large tripod can be sturdy yet lightweight at the same time”….”offering the best price to performance ratio on the market”. So have they achieved it?
I quite fancied the CT-3372 3-section tripod as it looked as though it would fit my needs exactly.
The CT-3372 is the largest tripod in their range; it includes a 3 year warranty, supports a very conservative 12kg and is manufactured from high grade carbon fibre tubes and 6061 T6 alloy. It weighs a mere 1.72kg and is supplied with a shoulder carry case and Allen key set.
Upon receiving the CT-3372, I was absolutely blown away by its weight (or lack of) and build quality. Bear in mind, I spent 15 years working as a Mechanical Design Engineer and I can honestly say the quality of materials, machining and construction are top notch.
The 3-section CT-3372 uses a top section tube diameter of 37mm; this makes the tripod look and feel quite chunky. The leg sections do not have any built-in anti-rotation mechanisms as Fesiol believe this would “lower the tripods sturdiness”.
The leg extension operates using a collar / olive style clamp arrangement.
One simply loosens the rubberised 6061 T6 alloy collar, slides the tube out and tightens the collar.
One can feel the air being drawn into the section and blown out as the leg is adjusted. The legs are supplied with standard rubber end caps and these can be replaced with stainless steel or alloy spikes as an optional extra.
I ordered the standard base plate version (as supplied) which has a large diameter flat plate for mounting your ball head or gimbal. Again, additional options include a levelling base and centre column.
Personally, I’m not an advocate of centre columns as they tend to undermine the stability of the tripod, although a levelling base may prove useful.
Fully extending the CT-3372 to its maximum height of 150cm (59″) makes for a very stable platform indeed.
To test this out I placed my 1DMkIII with EF500 onto a Acratech v2 ball head and the only discernible flex was actually in the ball head itself.
I then mounted a Jobu “Black Widow” onto the CT-3372 tripod and again placed my rig onto the tripod. There was absolutely no give in the leg sections and the platform was totally rock solid.
Pitching the CT-3372 against my colleague’s Gitzo 3 series, I would say that there was absolutely no difference in stability. In fact, the Feisol CT-3372 was probably more solid.
Now for some ground work!
Placing the Acratech ball head back on the tripod and using the Canon 1DMkII with EF100 macro lens, I decided to see how low I could go.
The CT-3372 has spring loaded pawls, which differ from those found on Gitzo and Manfrotto products. They offer 3 discrete angles of adjustment; 25/77 and 90 degrees. At the widest setting with legs retracted, the platform was 8cm of the ground – now that’s low!
Conclusion
Being totally frank about the CT-3372, in my view it rivals the competition in stability and build quality, marginally beats the competition for weight and annihilates the competition for price!
Add to this the fact that the CT-3372 comes with foam covers on all 3 top leg sections, an Allens key set and a shoulder bag (at no extra cost); it makes this one very desirable and affordable product.
Better still, Feisol have not tried to imitate Gitzo (like other far eastern manufacturers) but have decided to be innovative!
For those who may be interested in purchasing Fesiol products, they are now available direct from the UK at

Hi
I am to interested in this tripod also. how is it performing out in the field? Did you have to make replacments to any of the parts?
I ask because the little brother model CT-3371 is notorious for
broken off parts. In particular around the bolts on the base plate legs. It seems that the 3372 is redesigned in that area vs the 3371 so i wanted to ask.
Looking at pictures the base plate that holds the legs together looks similar to feisols tournament class CT-3342 model. Many users give praises to the CT-3342 against failure and replacement of parts.
any help who be great
thanks
No problems at all, the CT-3372 is in effect a big brother to the CT-3442. Part design is very similar and it feels pretty robust in the field.
Its possible that the Mk 1 models (CT-XXX1) had a few design flaws that need ironing out and as far as I can tell Feisol have used higher grade materials in the CT-XXX2 series.
Hi,
I’ve had a CT-3372 for a few months and agree with your review – it really is a great solid tripod, easy to set up and so light, the foam on the legs make it easy to carry around on long hikes.
The only negative side for me is the Feisol spikes – they’re not really spikes at all but threads with a slight point on the end. I’d like to fit Gitzo long spikes but they have a 3/8″ thread, the Feisol thread is bigger – I’ve no idea what size they are – 5/8″ maybe – any idea? Short of buying a metal lathe and making my own, I’m not sure what to do.
Hi Dav,
Thanks for the positive feedback. I’ve already emailed Feisol Taiwan with exactly the same issue. There really is no reason why the spikes couldn’t be captive, I’ll look into the thread size and let you know.
“The only negative side for me is the Feisol spikes – they’re not really spikes at all but threads with a slight point on the end.”
They have to be that way to be retractable, so that you can use them on pavement, floors, etc. Feisol does have long spikes, though they are for the smaller tripods (Standard, Tournament Class, and Travel):
http://www.feisoluk.com/Spikes-Sets/c29/p98/CT-MEDLSK—Long-Spike-Set/product_info.html
My guess is that they may expect that photographers who use tripods outdoors a lot will probably go for the lighter weight tripods. The CT-3301 Standard is 1.18kg/2.59lbs vs 1.72kg/3.79 bs for the CT-3372. The max load for the CT-3301 is 9kg/19.8lbs vs 12kg/26.5lbs for the CT-3372. The CT-3301 is also less than half the price of the CT-3372 ($215 vs $499 in the US).
I have the CT-3372, as well. I had the opportunity to examine each of the models before choosing. It came down to 3 models:
- CT-3401 ($219), which would have been a SLIGHT improvement over the Fancier CF tripod I already had (max load 9kg vs 8kg; folded 48 cm/18.8 in vs 49cm/19.3in; weight 1.18kg/2.5 lbs vs 1.27kg/2.8 bs; minimum height 17cm/6.6 in vs 36cm/14.2 in);
- CT-3371 ($319) greater max load (12kg), but 67cm/26.4in folded & 2.2kg/4.85lbs weight
- CT-3372 ($499) same max load as CT-3372, but improved base plate & hinges, lower min height (8cm/3.1in vs 17cm/6.7in) and lighter (1.72kg/3.79lbs vs 2.2kg/4.85lbs)
Speaking of the base plate, the CT-3372 base plate is quite different from that on the CT-3371. (One must be careful in ordering a leveling base, center column kit, horizontal column, etc.) It’s CNC milled, rather than cast. (The Gitzo base plates are also cast, as are many other parts.)
I got the CT-3372 as a major upgrade, rather than a minor one. I kept the Fancier tripod for carrying around (1.27 kg vs 1.72 kg) and traveling, because of its smaller folded length. (I can fit the Fancier, minus head, into a bag that meets US domestic carryon limits.) It has served me well, both with a Markins M10 ballhead and a Jobu Jr gimbal head. (My heaviest/largest lenses are the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS and 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, both of which work well with the Jobu Jr vs getting the more expensive Black Widow.
I also got a Feisol monopod (the smaller CM-1401–like one of the CT-3401 legs). It can carry 7kg and is about 53cm/20.9in folded. I kept my inexpensive Triopo CF monopod for traveling, as it folds to 42cm/16.5in.
Hello,
I’ve been reading your review and comments on the CT-3372, and wondered if you can answer my two queries. 1. What is your opinion on the four sections CT-3472? and 2. Is it as stable as the CT-3372?
Kind regard
Floyd
Hi Floyd, The 4 section CT-3472 is not quite as torsionally rigid as the 3 section, although this really depends on use. I have use super teles (EF500/600) lenses with the Feisol U-Mount on both 3 and 4 section without stability concerns. The real advantage of the 4-section is its shorter folded length.